<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>(the) Health Savings Accounts Blog &#187; employer sponsored</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msainfo.net/health-savings-accounts-blog/tag/employer-sponsored/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msainfo.net/health-savings-accounts-blog</link>
	<description>HSA plans and general healthcare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 21:28:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Health insurance no bargain for unemployed</title>
		<link>http://www.msainfo.net/health-savings-accounts-blog/cobra-health-insurance-for-unemployed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msainfo.net/health-savings-accounts-blog/cobra-health-insurance-for-unemployed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High cost of healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer sponsored]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msainfo.net/health-savings-accounts-blog/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COBRA is very expensive. Consider a short term health plan instead.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one not shocked by that headline recently in many major newspapers?  Of course, health insurance is expensive for the unemployed &#8211; it&#8217;s expensive for the EMployed too!</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/09/AR2009010903350.html">here&#8217;s that article from the Washington Post</a>)</p>
<p>But in fairness, the article focuses on the cost of COBRA plans &#8211; which have ALWAYS been prohibitively expensive for people who need them!</p>
<p>COBRA guarantees continued benefits for many people who have lost their jobs where they had group insurance (too many details to cover with COBRA, but that&#8217;s the jist of it).</p>
<p>So why is it so much MORE expensive than the group plan someone had prior to being unemployed?  Actually, it isn&#8217;t any more expensive.</p>
<p>Under COBRA, the (former) employee is simply forced to pay the full price of the plan.  Formerly, that same (former) employee was only paying a relatively small portion of the premium, which they still found to be &#8220;too expensive&#8221; of course.</p>
<p><strong><em>Are there any alternatives to COBRA?</em></strong></p>
<p>Yes!  Several insurance companies offer &#8220;short term&#8221; policies that are much less expensive than COBRA.  The catch: they are not guaranteed insurable plans, so you must qualify for coverage.  But, qualification is much easier than for full blown major medical plans.</p>
<p>Here is a link to the leading provider of short term health insurance, Time Insurance Company, an Assurant Health company: <a href="http://www.stminsurance.com/A16E5EDE4984780FC8F6F6A7A4C8042F">Short Term Health Plan Quotes</a></p>
<p>From that link, you can get your own quotes and apply online. Coverage can be in effect as soon as &#8211; tomorrow!</p>
<p>If you have any questions about this or any other health plans, please feel free to contact our offices, either via phone or email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msainfo.net/health-savings-accounts-blog/cobra-health-insurance-for-unemployed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voters support mandatory health coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.msainfo.net/health-savings-accounts-blog/voters-support-mandatory-health-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.msainfo.net/health-savings-accounts-blog/voters-support-mandatory-health-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer sponsored]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://msainfo.net/health-savings-accounts-blog/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over 80% of workers surveyed want the current employer-sponsored system to remain in force.
From Market Watch
COMMENT:
I wonder what the other 20% had to say?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over 80% of workers surveyed want the current employer-sponsored system to remain in force.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/voters-support-mandatory-health-insurance/story.aspx?guid=D6A66AC4-97D9-4B87-A9AC-0B307445D52E">From Market Watch</a></p>
<p>COMMENT:<br />
I wonder what the other 20% had to say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.msainfo.net/health-savings-accounts-blog/voters-support-mandatory-health-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
